A New Global Manner Beyond Our National Identities

A mobile buffer system would result in forming new global cultures that would allow us as human beings to rediscover ourselves in a new global manner beyond our national identities. Political entrustment wouldn’t replace our national identities instead it would bring us all together on a global level, which would result in also giving us a global understanding of ourselves. This would allow us to develop ourselves in new global ways that would make us a part of one another’s endeavors. Political entrustment will give us the tools needed to expand our global imagination that we will need to face the many global challenges that await us in the future.

A Mobile Hired Buffer System of Government

A buffer system of government would be a political market system consisting of hired forms of government. As a hired system of government those that wanted it would purchase it. Individuals would hire companies to provide them with personalized forms of government.

Because a buffer system of government would be a personalized system, it would also be highly mobile. As a mobile form of government, it would develop when and where it was wanted. Mobile forms of government would naturally come in contact with each other and in the process create new global cultures that would transcend their national limitations.

Political Entrustment As Buffer Political System

A personalized form of government would be one that could tailor itself around the needs of the person it was created to serve. It would be a buffer government system inserted between the people and the governments under whose jurisdiction they would reside. This buffer government system would be a political entrustment system that would politically represent the interests and concerns of people as well as help them obtain the types of services and products they needed. Political entrustment would be a system of privatized governments that people would hire to politically act in their behalf. Therefore, when a person had dealings with city, state or federal governments he or she would do it through their own personalized government provider hired to protect their interests.

People Fashioned Governments

People everywhere feel removed from their governments, which act as though their people are a means to their own end.  Governments everywhere act as though they are the important part of human society. It must be remembered that government is run by those people that created it and therefore, it always acts in its own interest even against the people in whose name it exists. Therefore, if the people are to have a government that works for them, it must also be formed and managed by them as well. This is exactly what political entrustment is all about. Political entrustment is about providing the people with a method that would allow them to form their own personalized governments that would be able to represent their interests and concerns at all levels of government.

Political Commodity

Government within political entrustment would be a political commodity. As a political commodity the public would purchase a political trust and its civil trusts when they need them.  Individuals would have personal needs that would each have its own civil trust consisting of the person with the need and the producer that would provide for the need. When all of those civil trusts providing for the same need are brought together under a single leadership a political trust is formed. Within political entrustment the civil trust providing for the need as well as the political trust organizing and representing it would all be political commodities that would be hired by those that need them.

Political Entrustment

Because governments are at the bidding of the corporate interests that fund them, what the people need is a personalized form of government that could represent their interests and concerns to the governments and corporations that they wish to influence. This personalized form of government would be political trusts that would be formed by those that needed them. Within this system of political entrustment people would hire the personalized governments that they need through the market process as a political commodity.

Redefining Society From The Bottom Up

If we are to reinvent ourselves, we need to take a different look at society and our part within it. Then we need to redefine society.

Society is divided into two parts. The first part consists of members of society that actually produce society’s products. The second part consists of those members of society that manage the relationships of those that actually produce society’s products. The ones that actually produce society’s products are the important ones. The ones that tell them what they can and cannot do are actually the less important ones. Therefore, while the bottom of society is always needed, the top of society is interchangeable and can be provided either privately or publicly.

But in our societies the top sees itself as the most important social sector and the bottom is seen as expendable. Historically those at the top have dominated those on the bottom. The top has used those on the bottom to achieve their own purposes. What we need is a society where the bottom tells the top what it wants and the top provides it for them the way that they want. This would allow the bottom of society to provide itself with the kind of top society that it felt was best for their particular purposes.

[x] Applying Government in a Box to Depressed Areas

The government in a box idea could be used to revitalize a community. The personal trustees together with their consumer and provider specialized trustees would pro-actively go to the people of a depressed area and place everyone into a labor pool. Their needs and capabilities would then be registered and allocated to those services most needed by the assessed situation.  The personal trustees would divide the people into groups that they would then politically represent.

They would each give their own members membership accounts consisting of four fundamental support subaccounts.   Each person’s membership account would consist of four fundamental support subaccounts needed to maintain themselves.   As holders of fundamental service subaccounts, people would either receive from or would provide for those that are to receive the services.

One type of fundamental subaccount would be to provide the necessary construction needed to provide the necessary housing. Another type of subaccount would be to supply the necessary foodstuffs. Still another type would be receiving the necessary schooling and training. And the last type of subaccount would be to have access to necessary health care. Then a community bank would be established to fund the accounts to promote the necessary economic activities between them.

The consumer and provider specialized trustees would determine the people’s needs and capabilities. They would place their people’s capabilities into a local labor pool that would be used to service the community. Once the fundamental services had stabilized, the people would go to their personal trustee for their various personal service needs and wants.

The personal trustees would link their people with the appropriate provider and consumer specialized trustees. They would bring their consumers and providers together by forming them into their own civil markets where they would manage the exchanges between them.

A person’s personal trustee would represent him or her to the consumer and provider specialized civil trustees that could provide them with their personal needs and wants.  These consumer and provider specialized civil trustees would bring their consumer’s needs together with their providers needs. To conduct their business with each other, they would form them into civil markets where they would voluntarily personally choose from one another the one best for themselves.

[x] Applying Government in a Box to the Haitian Crisis

I would like to thank my readers for indulging my absence from blogging due to pressing family matters. I feel that things have settled enough to where I can now continue my regular blogging.  I would like to continue with the idea of government in a box that I began in my previous blogs.

I would like to apply this idea of government in a box to the Haitian earthquake disaster.  Imagine that a group of people known as personal trustees would be introduced to Haiti. They would go into the community and divide its people into general groups each of which would be represented by their own personal trustee.

The personal trustees of each group would give their members a membership account.  Each membership account would consist of four fundamental support subaccounts for the basic support services needed by everyone.  A person’s subaccounts would provide each person with the basic services necessary to sustain themselves as well as their families so that they would be able to rebuild their lives.

The most essential fundamental subaccount would be the one that would be necessary to provide the construction required by the community. This would first require forming a labor pool from which it and all of the other support subaccounts would receive their own service providers and their consumers.

All persons would be issued with a consumer food subaccount that would allow them to consume foodstuffs. There would also be the issuance of food provider subaccounts for those members that could provide the necessary foodstuffs needed by the community.

Members of the labor pool could also receive the necessary schooling and training subaccounts needed for them to participate in various projects required by the community as well as those that they would need to provide for any new undertakings on their own. Some of the members of the labor pool would also be provided with subaccounts in order to provide the training needed by the rest of the community.

All members of the community, whether in the labor pool or not, would be issued with a subaccount that would give them access to their necessary health care needs. All of the members of the community would be collectively connected to their common community bank. This bank would fund all of the various subaccounts and civil accounts of the members of a community in order to promote the economic activities necessary between them.

After receiving their fundamental services in the form of their support subaccounts, the Haitian people would go back to their personal trustees for the servicing of their own personal needs and wants. Their personal trustees would connect them with consumer and provider specialized civil trustees that could provide them with the kinds of services that they personally needed.

These consumer and provider specialized civil trustees would register everyone’s needs and capabilities and divide them into their categories.  According to those categories they would also be organized to either receive their necessary services or to provide them to those that are to receive them.

They would form their consumers and their providers into civil markets designed to bring their consumer’s needs together with the providers that could service them. This would then allow them to voluntarily choose each other’s services and patronage.  These consumer and provider specialized civil trustees would protect their members’ interests for them by managing the exchanges made between them after they had been completed.

[x] Cooperatively Redefining the Market

To change from capitalism to a more socially oriented market system we must disassociate Capitalism from the function of a true market. With Capitalism, where everything is only seen in terms of its capital worth, the market is only about making money, through the trading of society’s capital.

Within a system of economic Cooperativism the market would be seen to be about the providing a cooperative exchange mechanism that would be designed to promote the cooperative relationships within society. We must show that a true market is actually about providing a cooperative arrangement between those participating in it.

This would take the market away from Capitalism’s grip and instead make it about providing a responsible cooperative relationship between its participating members. This would result in taking the market away from Capitalism’s view of it as a means to an end. This would also reveal that the nature of Capitalism is prone to allowing for the nefarious nature of human beings to develop and is increasingly being used for harmful proposes rather than for helpful purposes which is, after all, the true nature of the market.

Next Page »